|
Gray Panthers
Sacto. Monthly Meetings: 2nd Tuesday of
every month, Hart Senior Center
Steering Committee Meetings: 4th
Tuesday of every month, Hart Senior Center
Officers
Temporary leaders:
Margie Metzler, (916)
921-5008, margiemetz@hotmail.com;
Arnie Godmintz, (916) 332-5980, arniegod@sbcglobal.net;
Pat Naylor, (916) 391-6274, plnaylor@comcast.net
Lola Young: Treasurer
Dr. Karl Stoffers: Environment
Terrelle Terry: Disability issues
Lola Young: Aging & Disability Task Force
John Bernier, Pallo Defternos:
Peace/Nukes
Nell Ranta, Hospitality
Linda Roberts and Karen Raasch
(CIDs), Housing issues
Nell Ranta, Labor/Wage/ Women issues
Karen Raasch and Marjorie Murray: CIDs and Mobile
Homes
Linda Roberts: Urban Sprawl Issues
Margie Metzler: Medicare/ MediCal
Geri Esposito and Margie Metzler: Single Payer
Newsletter Editor: Betty Cooper Youngren
Writers: Joan Lee, John Bernier, Margie Metzler
Printing, Paratransit: Pat Naylor
Mailing: Pat Naylor
Labels and Mailing List: Margie Metzler
Local Press Releases: John Bernier
Peter D'Anna, SS/Medicare Advisor
Cordia Wade, County Commission Rep.
Dale Kooyman, Barbara Stanton, Richard Seyman,Transportation
Issues
Margie Metzler, Computer
Assistant
Margie Metzler, Medicare Part D/ Healthcare Reform
Program Coordinator and Webmaster, www.gpcal.org
Links
|
|
Gray Panthers Sacramento
Newsletters
Joan B. Lee,
1927-2008
Bill Young, 1932-2009
GRAY PANTHERS
GENERAL MEETING
March Meeting
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
1-3 pm
Hart Senior Center
28th and J Streets, Cypress Room
Preventing Gun
Violence
Amanda Wilcox, the Legislative Co-Person of the California
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, will be the speaker
at the March 9th meeting of the Gray Panthers of Sacramento.
The mission of California Brady Campaign Chapters is the
enacting of sensible and responsible gun laws at the local,
state and national levels.
Everyone is Welcome!
For further information contact
Margie Metzler at 916-921-5008.
Amanda Wilcox, the Legislative Co-Person
of the California Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence,
will be the speaker at the March 9th meeting of the Gray
Panthers of Sacramento. The mission of California Brady
Campaign Chapters is the enacting of sensible and responsible
gun laws at the local, state and national levels. The
Gray Panthers meeting will be 1 PM at the Hart Senior
Center, 915 - 27th St., Sacramento (between I and J Streets).
Our meetings are the second
Tuesday of every month, Cypress Room at the Hart Center.
Our Steering Committee meetings are on the fourth Tuesday
of every month and you are welcome to either meeting.
Please call 916-921-5008 if you have questions.
Everyone welcome!
Upcoming Meetings
-
-
In late March the California Budget
Project will have an all-day training session; several
of us will go and if others in the Chapter want to attend
we will reimburse (921-5008). We will devote our April
13th meeting to the CPB and their findings.
We decided to use the last 15 minutes of
every meeting for updates on IHSS, the budget, and healthcare/Medicare
issues.
| |
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/02/23/2556752_79-year-old-earns-degree-from.html
Our
Own Gray Panther Alice Thomas Finishes Law School
79-year-old earns degree
from McGeorge School of Law
By Blair Anthony Robertson
brobertson@sacbee.com
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page
1D
Last Modified: Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010 - 9:00 am
LEZLIE STERLING Bee file, 2008 Alice
Thomas, recently graduated from McGeorge School
of Law, will take the bar exam this summer.
Alice Thomas had the audacity to
enroll in law school at an uncommonly old age, the
perseverance to remain as her longtime companion
battled and eventually succumbed to Alzheimer's
disease, and the tenacity to endure setbacks that
included academic probation before finally graduating
from McGeorge School of Law.
Now, at age 79, she is the oldest graduate in McGeorge
history and one of the oldest lawyers-to-be the
nation has ever known. And she owes a ton of money
she borrowed to pay for her education – money
she will begin repaying after she takes the California
or Nevada bar exam this summer and, with any luck,
begins life as a rookie lawyer at age 80.
Yes, she's determined. Yes, she's stubborn, and
yes, finally, she is done with law school.
When Tim Naccarato, the principal assistant dean
at McGeorge, announces one by one the graduates
at the May 15 ceremony, he has Thomas' permission
to point out her staggering achievement to the crowd.
"She has been a delight since the day she got
here," said Naccarato.
A traditional legal education takes three years;
an older law student is usually someone in his or
her 30s. After a long career doing office work in
the construction industry, Thomas enrolled at McGeorge
in 2002 to pursue her long-held dream. She finished
her course work in late December.
Thomas held off on agreeing to a newspaper interview
until she landed the job she was seeking at a Reno
law firm, where she will work on legal issues involving
the elderly.
"I was so nervous during my final exam because
I thought, 'If I don't do well, I'm out,' "
Thomas said.
There was plenty of pressure. Time was not on her
side. Thomas struggled mightily at McGeorge. Her
longtime companion (she asked that his name not
be published) developed symptoms of Alzheimer's
and eventually died. Thomas served as his caregiver,
and the distraction eventually became too much.
Her grades plummeted and she was placed on academic
probation.
Thomas had to petition for reinstatement to continue.
During her years at McGeorge, it is a safe bet that
no one prompted more double-takes upon taking a
seat in class than Thomas, who was significantly
older not only than her fellow students but all
but one professor.
"Most of the time, the other students acted
like I wasn't even alive. Some of them asked if
I was really serious," she said. "I told
them I could take a first-class trip around the
world and not spend as much money and not have to
work as hard."
Thomas was, indeed, a fixture on campus, lugging
her thick law books from class to class in a suitcase
on wheels. Said Naccarato with a chuckle. "I
used to kid her that she looks like she's going
to Las Vegas for the weekend."
Thomas often wore a pearl necklace, dressed conservatively
and, to her frequent dismay, sometimes wondered
about the fashion statements of her fellow students.
"I see people coming in here with bare midriffs
and their fannies showing," she said, frowning.
To pay for law school, Thomas had to get low-interest
student loans. Now she has to start paying them
back – to the tune of $70,000.
She doesn't expect to change the world as a lawyer,
but she hopes her time in the field will at least
allow her to "nibble at" some injustices.
Thomas is in no mood for a life of leisure. At an
age when she could be planning her next cruise,
she is thinking about the months ahead, her new
job and the arduous process of studying for the
bar exam. She will turn 80 in July and likely won't
find out if she passed until around Thanksgiving.
During her years at McGeorge, Thomas worked at the
school's Elder Law Clinic, helping seniors with
a variety of legal challenges. Initially, she was
reluctant to be pigeonholed as someone who wanted
to work only on behalf of seniors, but she says
she grew to love the work and embraced the wide
range of challenges.
While a student, Thomas often confronted the question
of why she was putting herself through such a tough
task. A legal education is notoriously difficult
and stressful, full of long hours and seemingly
endless reading and memorizing.
Back in 2008, Thomas told The Bee she wanted to
become a lawyer so she could help people, make money
doing it and continue to flourish as an active person.
"A lot of people my age think I'm out of my
mind," Thomas said at the time. "But a
lot of older people just sit and watch the grass
grow, and they end up disintegrating.
"When you quit learning something, you might
as well crawl into a coffin and pull the dirt in
after you."
© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights
reserved. |
Town Hall Meetings in our Area
As you know from radio, TV and newspapers,
Congress members throughout the country recently held town
hall meetings to discuss health care issues, many disrupted
by loud demonstrations. Gray Panthers member Margie Metzler
attended the Matsui meeting, two Lungren meetings, and one
McClintock meeting and submitted the following report and
the article from the Bee, October 11:
Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Sacramento, greets
Gloria Powell, 78, of Sacramento at her town hall meeting
Saturday at Sutter Middle School. She asked constituents
to be patient with Congress. "This is like the third
quarter of a football game," she said. "We want
to sign at the end of the year so we can begin reform on
January 1. … We are taking the time to do it right."
Unlike noisy town-hall meetings on overhauling
health care that dominated the summer in Northern California,
Saturday's session in Sacramento was more pep rally than
shouting match.
The meeting, hosted by Rep. Doris Matsui,
D-Sacramento, drew about 700 people and only a few boos.
And it drew a pledge from Matsui to stand fast by a controversial
public health insurance option, expanded coverage and medical
care cost-cutting -- the hallmarks of insurance overhaul
demands by left-leaning Democratic Party members in Washington,
D.C.
"I want to make sure no family in Sacramento
risks bankruptcy just because a loved one gets sick,"
Matsui said to cheers. "This bill will ensure that
97 percent of Americans have access to health insurance.
Right now, 100,000 people in this community are uninsured."
It was Matsui's first in-person meeting
with constituents in the health care debate, and it may
be her last. Matsui has been criticized for not having a
meeting earlier, but she said conversations with constituents
now will have greatest impact on reform.
"We are still in the middle of the process, but now
we know the ideas," she said.
She asked constituents to hang tight through the politicking
in Washington -- a process expected to last at least another
couple of months.
"This is like the third quarter of
a football game," she said. "We want to sign at
the end of the year so we can begin reform on January 1.
? We are taking the time to do it right."
At Saturday's Democratic rally in Sacramento, health insurance
companies were vilified.
Dan Monahan, a Sacramento surgeon, said
when he began practicing 22 years ago he naively thought
health insurance companies wanted the best for his patients.
He said he discovered they were less interested in patients'
health than saving money by denying services.
"No other country in the world has
for-profit insurance companies like we do," he said.
One lone man made a fuss and was quelled
by a policewoman. Bill Cooper of Sacramento wore a "Nobama"
T-shirt and held a mini American flag. He said he opposes
a public option because it would not increase competition
among health insurers.
"You're wrong!" he shouted repeatedly,
while other nearby participants rolled their eyes. "You're
just freaking lying!"
Despite the friendly atmosphere, questions
directed at Matsui were diverse. Some participants asked
personal questions, referencing their own experiences with
the health care system. Matsui's audience at Sutter Middle
School was a racially diverse mix of young and old.
Some of Matsui's toughest questioning came
from liberal critics, such as Claire Toomay, a McClatchy
High School teacher, who pointedly asked about the influence
of the health care industry in drafting overhaul legislation.
Matsui's response was uncharacteristically
animated.
Insurance companies don't want a public
option, she said, but she supports it. Pharmaceutical companies
have been reluctant to negotiate Medicare drug prices, but
she wants them to, she said.
"Health care reform may work this time because everyone
is around the table," she said. "In the Clinton
administration, we froze them out."
Toomay said the passion from Matsui was
unexpected. Matsui's town hall was a contrast to forums
hosted by her congressional colleagues this past summer
when feverish debate produced standing-room-only crowds.
Saturday there were no real clashes. There
were no dueling pickets outside the town hall, as there
were at town halls held by Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River.
There was, however, Charles Johnson of
Sacramento, who bemoaned the complexity of the nation's
current health-care system. Enrolled on Medicare Advantage,
he said he feels overwhelmed by the unfamiliar insurance
plan choices and all the acronyms he faces.
"You have to have a lawyer to get insurance,"
he said.
But the one comment that elicited a prolonged
standing ovation was something everybody seemed to understand.
"This debate ends up being about a
moral right," said Gay Jones of Sacramento. "Everybody
needs to make this moral decision-- that everybody is entitled
to health care."
Matsui is on the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, one of three House panels that have drafted health
care overhaul bills. Matsui said her committee's plan is
deficit neutral and that those who are happy with their
private coverage or Medicare would continue to have the
same. For the uninsured, she said, she supports a health
insurance exchange marketplace.
:
Report
on Lungren Town Hall Meetings
Margie Metzler

I went to two of the three Lungren Town Halls
and my friend Arnie Godmintz went to the third.
The first, on August 19, was in Citrus Heights.
I got there about 20 minutes before the event
was to begin, and was too late to get in. I stayed
in the line about an hour, however, talking to
people. There were people with signs and flyers
all around, most objecting to the public option,
and one demonstration, three black guys, held
a sign showing Barack Obama with a Hitler mustache.
I heard later they were with Lyndon Larouche.
The demonstrations were impassioned, but not violent
and I felt no danger. There were a lot of progressives
there too and that was comforting.
I chatted with a guy in front of me, older and
mad in general. He seemed somewhat confused and
I noticed that he was pretty much just spouting
the talking points from Fox. I told him I was
uninsured and asked him what kind of healthcare
he had, and he answered “Medicare”.
I pointed out that is a government program and
asked how he liked it. He loves it. “I just
want the program you have,” I responded.
He continued railing about “government interference,”
no understanding and no irony. I asked him if
he gets his news from Fox, and he said “Yes,
that’s where you hear the truth.”
I said mildly that they don’t in fact tell
the truth and that was that.
I said to the four people behind me, “I
am uninsured and I am scared.” They were
not pro-reform, but were nice people, and asked
me why I was not insured. I said that I had been
laid off from a good job three years ago and that
it is not easy for a woman in her 60’s to
find a job, especially in this economy, and that
I was now working three part-time jobs, including
adjunct teacher in a local college, but these
are all jobs that don’t provide benefits.
I think people ask why I’m uninsured because
they want to prove I am a bum, i.e. not a worthwhile
person, and also to prove to themselves that this
couldn’t happen to them. They are always
quiet when I tell them my story, probably because
it does indeed occur to them that bad things can
happen to good people and in fact they are in
danger too.
The woman with the group spoke up. “These
three guys work for me, and I can barely afford
their insurance. If my taxes get raised I won’t
be able to afford it any more.” I sympathized
but than said “Have your costs to insure
them gone up every year?” and she said yes.
I asked “Well, if nothing changes, won’t
these increasing costs force you to cut off their
insurance anyway?” She said yes, and one
of the guys said I had given him something to
think about.
I also went to the Town Hall on Aug. 26 in Rancho
Cordova. To me, that one was much more depressing.
The group was orderly. There were people with
signs, but no yelling that I saw. I was behind
a man in his 80’s, who had a sign that said
No government programs, Government stay out of
my healthcare, keep the constitution, no more
taxes, and No to socializm (sic.) I tapped him
on the shoulder and noted that he had spelled
socialism incorrectly, told him I was uninsured
myself, at 64, and then asked what healthcare
he had. He answered “Medicare and Tricare.”
I said that those were the best and he was most
fortunate, but did he realize that those were
both “Government programs.” He seemed
surprised and said “that’s different.”
I added that I just want the same for myself.
Inside the building, there were two large rooms
so most of us were seated. Lungren was in the
other room, but there was a large screen so we
could see him. There were staffers with microphones
in both rooms and with the group outside as well,
and they took questions from all three places.
The questions were mostly friendly and led to
Lungren’s responses such as Protect Medicare
and don’t let Democrats take away from seniors,
which I found shocking, “Keep government
from getting between seniors and their doctors,
No rationing based on age, and prevent government
from interfering with end-of-life care discussions;
Ensure that everyone one can keep what coverage
they have, and protect veterans.”
There were several questions I thought were genuine:
First a woman told Mr. Lungren that she and her
husband had insurance, but their 6 year old child
recently was diagnosed with an eye condition which
required surgery, and they had just found out
that their share of the expense would be over
$8000 (I would guess that they have an HSA, which
appears to be Mr. Lungren’s idea of reform.
He mentioned Health Savings Accounts several times
but never described them.) She asked plaintively,
“What is there we can do? We have to take
care of our baby.” I expected Lungren to
offer to meet with her, but he didn’t. He
suggested she look into local “charities”,
and suggested that they try the Shriner’s
Hospital. I was genuinely shocked.
I was allowed to ask a question after someone
railed against the “loss of liberties”
healthcare reform would cause. I said that “there
is always a tension in every democracy between
the individual liberties of citizens and the best
interests of society as a whole. I am uninsured,
and shortly after I first heard of the Swine Flu,
I developed flu-like symptoms and did not see
a doctor. But,” I asked, “in a country
where fully 20% of the citizens under 65 are uninsured
and unlikely to see a doctor except when they're
seriously ill, how can we expect to track or contain
pandemics such as Swine Flu?” Lungren started
by defending the CDC (which of course I hadn’t
attacked), and then said he “questioned
my statistics”, and then he stopped suddenly,
paused, admitted he had completely lost his train
of thought and asked for another question. (I
turned to the woman nest to me, a single-payer
proponent, and whispered gleefully that “My
question brought the man to his knees.”)
On the way home I was agitated and depressed.
I really was angry at Lungren: for being mean-spirited,
unfeeling, partisan, and dishonest. It was clear
that he uses his Town Halls to spread Conservative
orthodoxy, but that he gets very rattled when
the questions go in other directions. I was also
angry at those nice, suburban people who love
him and trust him. When I got to the computer
I Googled some of the expressions he had used
repeatedly, and was directed to the Fox News website,
and from there, to the Republican National Committee
website, Seniors Health Care Bill of Rights (http://www.gop.com/news/NewsRead.aspx?GUID=bc1d50c0-5ef7-4026-8db5-efd402b01677
). I have reprinted this document below with my
comments in red.
The Enemies of healthcare
reform are cynically, carefully and in lock step
going after seniors. Their goal is to get them
to vote and act against the Obama administration…
in spite of the fact that they would be voting
against their own self-interests.
Note: This is clearly
the fight on our hands right now. We in Gray Panthers
are committed to educating legislators of both
parties and at both the state and Federal level
about health care issues.
Monday, August 24, 2009
Seniors’ Health Care Bill
Of Rights
http://www.gop.com/news/NewsRead.aspx?GUID=bc1d50c0-5ef7-4026-8db5-efd402b01677
America’s senior citizens
deserve access to quality health care and
coverage that will not bankrupt them. Republicans
believe that reforms to America’s
health care system are necessary, but that
reform should first do no harm, especially
to our seniors.
That’s why Republicans are calling
for a Seniors’ Health Care Bill Of
Rights that will:
- PROTECT MEDICARE AND NOT CUT IT IN
THE NAME OF HEALTH CARE REFORM: President
Obama and Congressional Democrats are
promoting a government-run health care
experiment that will cut over $500 billion
from Medicare to be used to pay for their
plan. Medicare should not be raided to
pay for another entitlement. (Margie
note: this refers to the Medicare Advantage
plans. In the ghastly Medicare Part D
legislation the Bill set up many so-called
Medicare Advantage plans, which are private
plans including Kaiser that give HMO convenience
in addition to Medicare Part B, which
is coverage for doctor’s office
visits etc. Medicare Part A only covers
hospitalization and is free to seniors;
part B is optional and costs and extra
$96.40 which is typically deducted from
your Social Security. Part D. Signing
up for these Advantage plans cost the
senior an extra amount, like $100 for
Kaiser, and the government kicks in multiple
dollars in addition, to Kaiser or whoever.
We hated this because it was a cynical
giveaway to the insurance companies from
the get-go, and now seniors love it…
and why not, while they are screaming
to keep government’s hand off their
Medicare, they are being deeply subsidized.
And now I can think of no way to pull
back on these programs without being perceived
as attacking seniors)
- PROHIBIT GOVERNMENT FROM GETTING BETWEEN
SENIORS AND THEIR DOCTORS: The Democrats’
government-run health care experiment
will give patients less power to control
their own medical decisions, and create
government boards that would decide what
treatments would or wouldn’t be
funded. Republicans believe in patient-centered
reforms that put the priorities of seniors
before government. (The
bureaucrats we must really fear are those
in the insurance companies!)
- PROHIBIT EFFORTS TO RATION HEALTH CARE
BASED ON AGE: The Democrats’ government-run
health care experiment would set up a
“comparative effectiveness research
commission” where health care treatment
decisions could be limited based on a
patient’s age. Republicans believe
that health care decisions are best left
up to seniors and their doctors. (This
refers to any effort to measure the effectiveness
of various treatments and considering
trade-offs of outcomes and costs. Which
most other countries do.)
- PREVENT GOVERNMENT FROM INTERFERING
WITH END-OF-LIFE CARE DISCUSSIONS: The
Democrats’ government-run health
care experiment would have seniors meet
with a doctor to discuss end-of-life care
that could mean limiting treatment. Republicans
believe that government should not interfere
with end-of-life care discussions between
a patient and a doctor. (This
is from language in HR3200, which allowed
a physician to consult with terminally
ill patients to discuss end of life options
like Do not Resuscitate, wills, performing
extraordinary measures, Hospice etc. Physicians
have generally done this, but under Medicare
rules they don’t get paid for any
conversations, only for procedures. Because
of the distortions, and lies that arose
from these innocuous statements, I think
they have been removed. So your doctor
will continue to not get paid for sitting
down and talking with you just when you
need him the most.)
- ENSURE SENIORS CAN KEEP THEIR CURRENT
COVERAGE: As Democrats continue to propose
steep cuts to Medicare in order to pay
for their government-run health care experiment,
these cuts threaten millions of seniors
with being forced from their current Medicare
Advantage plans. Republicans believe that
seniors should not be targeted by a government-run
health care bill and forced out of their
current Medicare coverage. (See
the first item above.)
- PROTECT VETERANS BY PRESERVING TRICARE
AND OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS FOR MILITARY
FAMILIES: Democrats recently proposed
raising veterans’ costs for the
Tricare For Life program that many veterans
rely on for treatment. Republicans oppose
increasing the burden on our veterans
and believe America should honor our promises
to them. (Need
to do research on this one. Let me know
if you know more. But a guy brought this
one up in the Lungren meeting too)
|
|
-
-
-
March
Meeting: Lenny Goldberg: California’s Crisis
-
-
January 2009 Meeting:
Former Sacramento Mayor Anne Rudin
-
Nov. Meeting: Lola
Young, California Senior Legislature
-
Our own Lola Young, who is not
only a Legislator in the California Senior Legislature
but is the newly elected Chair of the powerful Rules
Committee, told us the history of the group, what it
does, and what has been accomplished. She also talked
about the October session and what came from that session,
and gave us a brief description of some top priority
proposals.
-
-
Sept. 9: Taking
Back the Airwaves: Are The Media
Serving the Public Interest?
-
-
The answer was NO, of course!
-
-
ALSO: Michael Negrete , a
valued ally in the Medicare Part D. fights, spoke with
us re Pharmacy issues.
|
Note: Please see our
new page, devoted to single-payer healthcare issues!
Autumn
Gray Panthers California Meeting
To be held in San Francisco
on Sept. 12; location to be announced.
PowerPoint
Presentation: Gray Panthers National Issues
Non-PowerPoint
users click here.
Margie Metzler, Convenor of Sacramento
Gray Panthers chapter, speaks out about the budget cuts:
Governor Schwarzenegger has dealt a massive blow to
California’s seniors by not only signing the state’s
awful budget, but by vetoing funds for additional critically
needed programs.
His vetoes eliminated funding for Alzheimer’s
Day Care Resource Centers, domestic home care services
for people with dementia, Alzheimer’s, and on respirators
or feeding tubes, and slashed Caregiver Resource Centers.
He also targeted money from administration and oversight
of IHSS programs. Keep in mind that the IHSS and Caregiver
Resources Centers brought in millions of dollars in federal
funding, which the state also lost.
This year’s budget has been a nightmare to seniors,
from start to finish. Gray Panthers have been vocal at
most of the rallies, hearings, and other events trying
to ensure that the budget would be a reasonable combination
of revue increases and cuts.
Well, we lost this one. But once we get over the shock,
we need to get right back into action. There will be numerous
opportunities to protest, speak up, write letters to the
editor, and contact our legislators. I firmly believe
that most citizens have no idea what this budget will
do to them personally, and we must remind them as opportunities
arise. We must pass on the true stories of what the cuts
do to seniors and shine a spotlight on the real faces
of those who suffer.
We are already seeing instances when citizens are taking
up collections to keep pools open or mowing lawns in their
parks. This sound good, but people need to be aware that
these too are taxes.
We all know that nothing has changed and that until we
get changes in the budget process, change the 2/3 necessary
to pass taxes, and change term limits, we are in the midst
of a permanent disaster.
In the meantime, we still have national and state healthcare
battles to work on!
|
To comment on the current budget (or
other issues), contact:
-
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Sacramento
office (916) 445-2841; San Francisco office (415) 703-2218;
e-mail from the governor's Web site at gov.ca.gov.
-
-
-
-
-
The Sierra Club action center sent us
a great site where you are able to see a map of your personal
home's geographic location and determine how "walkable"
it is. As we continue to work with the Sacramento Mobility Coalition
on this and other transportation issues, this is good information
to have. You can find it at http://action.sierraclub.org/site.
Photo
Albums of Gray Panthers at Local Events
If you have photos of any of our events you would like to
share, please contact our
Webmaster.
Back to
top |
 |
|
Documents
Read our Newsletters
Each month our network puts out a newsletter,
which contains original articles and commentary, as well as
information about our meetings and events.
We would love to know what you think! Please
tell us by emailing our convenor: margiemetz@hotmail.com
Back to top
Why Should You Belong to the Gray Panthers?
Joining our local group can be the first step
in helping us make a difference. As a member of Gray Panthers,
you can participate more effectively as part of a group, in
rallies, petition drives, advocacy efforts and campaigns,
or in developing informational programs and unified strategies.
Print our form,
fill it out, mail it in to join!
Back to top
Gray Panthers bring about changes through testifying
at hearings, getting petitions signed, and belonging to local
task forces. They help with the newsletter or belong to focus
committees, join advocacy efforts and provide financial support
with their dues. Each member is free to choose their own level
of involvement. Whatever your interests and concerns, we have
a spot for you!
Call your Senator: 866-808-0065 (TOLL-FREE)
or 202-225-3121 (NOT TOLL-FREE)
List of new committee heads
etc. and California Congresspeople (no excuse for not contacting
them!)

WHO ARE
WE?
Gray Panthers is a local and
national organization of individuals dedicated to social change.
We welcome members of all ages who wish to work together on
the tough problems which effect everyone of all generations. |

Info for sending
postcards (what you can say, where you can send it...)
| |
Maggie Kuhn, Gray Panthers
Founder
“Stand before the
people you fear and speak your mind—even if your
voice shakes…. Well-aimed slingshots can topple
giants.”
--Maggie Kuhn
In the 1970’s Maggie
Kuhn was often a guest on the late lamented Phil Donohue
Show. She was scrawny and fragile in appearance, but
when she opened her mouth you heard her roar (and believe
me, her voice did not shake!) She was one of
the most powerful and articulate women of any age, and
many of us wanted to be just like her. Her newly minted
organization, soon dubbed the Gray Panthers, showed
extraordinary passion in the highly principled stands
they took on many issues.
Maggie Kuhn was born in
1905 and spent most of her life working in socially-active
jobs and social activism. She never married or had children;
in her later years she acknowledged that “when
I look back on my life, I see so many things I could
not have done if I had been tied to a husband and children.”
At age 65 she was forced to retire, and then she really
got busy. She organized other retirees and formed the
Gray Panthers Movement. This group believed then, as
it does today, that injustice affects everyone. Members
involve themselves in senior issues, but they also focus
on issues including peace, clean elections, the environment,
poverty and civil liberties. The organization's motto
is “Age and Youth in Action”, and they welcome
anyone into their ranks.
Maggie believed fervently
that old age is not a simple preparation for death or
adapting to increasing fragility, but that it is a time
of continuing sexuality (“Love and sex until rigor
mortis”). She stated that “old age is not
a disease – it is strength and survivorship, triumph
over all kinds of vicissitudes and disappointments,
trials and illnesses.” She also remarked that
“the ultimate indignity is to be given a bedpan
by a stranger who calls you by your first name.”
Kuhn continued to be a
fervent activist until she died at age 89. |
|
Contact
Information
Gray
Panthers of Sacramento
P.O. Box 19438, Sacramento, CA 95819
For more information
contact
Temporary leaders: Margie
Metzler, (916) 921-5998, margiemetz@hotmail.com;
Arnie Godmintz, (916) 332-5980, arniegod@sbcglobal.net
Website: http://www.gpcal.org/indexsac.htm
Meetings:
Monthly Meetings: 2nd Tuesday of the month, 1-3
Steering Committee, 4th Tuesday of the month, 1-3
Hart Senior Center, 915 27th Street, Sacramento, CA 95816
Back to top
|
| |